DC.Watch Sony G Master Interview (Part 2)


DC.Watch had the opportunity to speak with Sony about their G series of lenses and below you can find some excerpts from part two of the interview. You can find part one here. Since the interview is translated I will do my best to clear up the language.

  • Customers the shoot portraits often assign Eye AF to the focus hold button on the lens
  • G Master lenses are tuned for photography and videography
  • Photography and videography AF are very different algorithms
  • They suppress changes in angle of view on G Master lenses because they appear unnatural in video
  • Many use manual focus for movie production in addition to photography
  • Sony doesn’t design G Master lenses with size/weight restrictions in mind beyond them being reasonable. Optical performance comes first.
  • Originally they tried to stay below 77mm, but they ended up going up to 82mm so they wouldn’t have to bend the light in ways that would affect optical quality.
  • Would only increase the size of the lens to increase resolving power.
  • Resolution and blur tend to not be compatible and the more resolution you add the harder the blur becomes.
  • The ideal point where resolution and blur quality meet is hard to hit and that’s why there has to be very tight manufacturing standards.
  • Sony thinks they can hit 50 lines per mm when most only hit 30 lines per mm.
  • Sony tries to raise high-frequency and low-frequency MTF, but it can affect sharpness or blur.
  • You can’t compare the quality of film lenses and digital lenses.
  • 100mm and 85mm lenses are designed to have optimal blur at portrait focal lengths.
  • It is now possible to simulate the designs to achieve the best balance.
  • Blur simulation lets the camera side characteristics be examined instead of a point like on a spot diagram.
  • The Right side is an example of what G Master lenses aim for.
  • It’s only an example but “the shape of blur changes according to the distance to the subject and the positional relationship with the background, we will make delicate balancing so that the blurred image becomes close to the ideal at any distance”
  • There is an emphasis on getting blur right at closer distances than infinity.
  • Sony accuracy of curved surface and surface roughness are “orders of magnitude higher than conventional aspheric lenses with high precision.”
  • These are being produced at Sony Global Manufacturing & Operations Co., Ltd., Kota site and use proprietary methods.
  • More diaphragm blades aren’t the answer for better bokeh and can cause resistance.
  • Sony uses linear motors and magnets in there AF system that are optimized for the specific G Master lens.
  • “Currently adopted methods of actuators are the ring drive SSM, and the linear motor we introduced, and the direct drive SSM (DDSSM). DDSSM is a driving method based on ultrasonic vibration, but it is a motor that generates driving force directly in the straight direction rather than generating driving force in the direction of rotation like the ring drive SSM. Since it is unnecessary to convert rotational motion into linear motion, unnecessary load of the driving member can be minimized, and a focus driving structure with high speed and very responsiveness can be realized.”
  • DDSSM is driven by ultrasonic vibration, while the linear motor is driven by electromagnetic force, but both are considered linear motors.
  • “The optical merit of floating focus is that you can achieve a high level of image quality from infinity to close up.”
  • “By moving two focusing units independently, you can shorten the shortest shooting distance and further improve the image quality in the immediate vicinity.”
  • “100-400 mm has two systems in front and behind, but they are driven using completely independent actuators, respectively.”
  • The 100-400mm has DDSSM on the front side and double linear motor on the back side.
  • “moving multiple lightweight focus groups is more advantageous in terms of responsiveness than moving one heavy focus group”
  • “control of two focus units must be perfectly synchronized and controlled, just because one focus unit is misaligned will make it impossible to focus”
  • “In telephoto lenses, the correction amount of camera shake increases, so it is often advantageous to incorporate a camera shake correction mechanism on the lens side.”
  • “When there is a camera shake correction mechanism on the lens side, basically rolling (direction of rotation) and shift shake are compensated to some extent, such as correction on the body side.”
  • Magnesium alloy was used inside the 100-400mm to keep weight down and is an example of how G Master lenses don’t compromise.
  • The anti vibration unit from the 100 mm STF was used in the 100-400mm.

Interview Summary:
NEX-3 and NEX-5, Sony’s first mirror-less machines were released in 2010, full-size α 7 and α 7 R were released in 2013. Recalling now, I am surprised that it was so recently. It seems that the development in the meantime was overwhelming, as it seemed that more than ten years had passed since the experience. If I think about it, I remember saying that I wanted a 35 mm full size machine on the day of the NEX – 5 recital. When announcing α 7, I said I want a faster AF. Through this interview, we reconfirmed again the greatness of Sony’s development capabilities, which immediately reflects the needs of such users in the next model.

In the interview, it is told that the age at which G Master was born was the appearance of α 7 R II (released in August 2015), but since the appearance of G Master is in the spring of 2016, it is less than a year It was developed between. Even though it may have been planned before, it may be that α7R II was at the time of its appearance, but its development speed is phenomenal even if it is so.

Another thing that surprised me is the use of parts by the unprecedented advanced manufacturing technology represented by the magnesium member and the XA lens used in the inner lens barrel and the use of advanced assembly and adjustment technology right. I have been listening to engineers for many years, but I have not remembered such a high-precision, high-quality production consistent from design to assembly up to this point. Even in the impression using the actual G Master lens, there was no performance variation in any individuals, and the experience that uniformly outstanding photography results were obtained confirmed the contents of this story.

The body is amazing, but the lens is amazing. Sony’s development capabilities, beginning with transistors and leading the cutting edge of the era such as Trinitron tube and CCD, are now being focused on developing cameras. There is no doubt that Sony’s presence in the camera industry will become even larger in the future.

via DC. Watch

 

This entry was posted in Sony Interview. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.